blogging4jobs
| ![]() |
Posted: 13 May 2011 05:17 AM PDT
![]() Earlier this week, a good friend of mine interviewed for an HR Director position for a multi-location long-term health care business. It was Tammy’s second interview, and when I talked to her she felt positive about her chances. She even inquired confidently about next steps and the time line for the decision making process. The management team assured her that they were still in the beginning of the final decision making process with no concrete decision deadline. And yet they weren’t completely honest. Less than twenty-four hours later, Tammy walked to her mailbox and was surprised to receive a standard form turn down letter addressed to her from said company. And while I applaud the company for getting back to her since 50% of companies admittedly don’t engage candidates in any form, it was a slap in the face. I call tactics like these candidate anti-engagement strategies. These are seen as a snub in the face of the candidate. Second class citizens who are the junk mail of the employment and applicant tracking world. Companies are conflicted and uncomfortable to deliver bad news so instead they employ a common managerial tactic — avoidance, aloofness, and unavailability. You know what I mean — ring twice and go to voice mail. And it’s treatment like these that leads candidates to fill the grapevine with candidate experiences that are angry, bitter, and hurt. This anti-engagement strategy leaves the candidate with one too many unanswered questions. It’s similar to that sales person who I contact asking them for a quote on marketing materials. We chat for a few minutes, promise to return my calls, and I never hear from them again. Except I’m the one paying the marketing company. And the candidates are the ones receiving payment. It’s like dropping off my dry cleaning never to pick it up. Tammy is more than qualified to be the senior human resource position at the company in question. Often times in situations like this where there are multiple candidates who meet the minimum qualifications, it comes down to subjectives like culture fit, personality, and gut feelings. So why do these intangibles give us an excuse to treat our remaining candidates like second class citizens? Companies should be building relationships with their candidates regardless of their status. It’s piss poor customer service, an anti-engagement strategy that eventually will lead to a company with egg on their face. Companies should always:
With the economy improving good candidates will once again be in short supply. Older workers are counting the days and months till their retirement, but the younger workforce are like elephants — they never forget. Treating your candidates like second class citizens may not hurt you today but it will in the future, and with sites like Glassdoor, JobVent, and the SimplyHired Forum, it’s really only a matter of time. Never heard of Glassdoor, JobVent, or Simply Hired? Here are a list of more employment venting sites to get you started. Want to know more about candidate engagement? Kevin Wheeler (@kwheeler) has a great article from 2008 on ERE. Think I’m full of crap or maybe you agree with me? I encourage you to leave a comment below. Photo Credit Business Week. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Blogging4Jobs To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment