blogging4jobs
| |
|
Posted: 20 May 2011 09:40 AM PDT
In reality, the Manager’s intention is to save payroll, keep himself from being reprimanded by his boss, and while doing what he sees is a favor for his friend allowing him to keep his job. The reality and outcome is when Manager gets caught is that he’s violated company policy, his company owes Employee back pay, as well as Manager puts the company at risk with the U.S. Department of Labor, the Wage and Hour Division. The law doesn’t care about intentions, it only cares about acts and outcomes. As a HR Director, I’ve heard my share of responses from employees when we questioned them about their actions during employment investigations. I heard things like, “Well, that’s not what I meant.” “She/He took my comment the wrong way.” And my personal favorite, “I was just kidding.” The problem therein lies we weren’t raised this way. Because in our home and family life, intentions do matter. It’s the reason why the saying, “the old college try” was created. Outside of the bubble that is HR and corporate speak, intentions do matter. It’s the reason why I encourage my daughter to color within the lines, and I’m thrilled even when it doesn’t quite work out the way I instructed. As I’m writing I wonder, how does one make the transition between understanding when and where intentions vs. outcomes matter? Is this something we train in school? And isn’t the greatest teacher of all failure when intentions truly reign? And how this factor into the corporate and HR world? Because playing it safe and living with constant predicted outcomes makes the world a very predictable, measurable, and boring place. A safe place mind you where everyone drives the speed limit and obeys the law but where risk rarely happens. Photo Credit Emel. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Blogging4Jobs To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
No comments:
Post a Comment