
I have worked in the recruitment industry for ten years now, and have been in the workforce for well over thirty years. I love to work; I have always loved starting new jobs and have never really minded the application/interview/offer/negotiation process. Each company or individual with whom I have gone through this process has been great and I have had
only good experiences. And do you know why? Because I
only applied to jobs for which I was qualified. This seems to be a rarity these days as I field seemingly endless incoming resumes and applications for various positions.
We hear an incredible amount of talk these days about
The Candidate Experience and making sure candidates are well taken care of. Frankly, I am sick to death of recruiters and hiring managers
not being taken care of.
Yes, this is a sound off,
yes, I am a bit perturbed as I sift through the fifty plus resumes in my inbox, of which only three belong to somewhat qualified candidates. I am shaking my fist and ready to fight for Recruiters' Rights, for Hiring Managers' Freedoms.
Every recruiter and hiring manager has the right to receive resumes and applications from smart, qualified candidates – candidates who understand the position for which they are applying. Recently, a hiring manager, who also happens to be the CEO of a small tech company was looking to hire a junior developer – a junior techie. Sadly, several applications and resumes later, only one seemed remotely close to a fit at first glance-over. The CEO conducted a phone interview – the candidate was merely alright.
Merely.
But somehow, through some convoluted and clandestine search of his own, this candidate got a hold of the CEO's cell number
and his home number and proceeded to call incessantly, one afternoon chalking up
eight calls in two hours! And that was all it took. This hiring manager's freedoms had been violated; he had not led the candidate on – he had told him that others were to be interviewed before a next step would be discussed. Recruiters and hiring managers have the right to qualified candidates. It is their job to be discriminatory, saying no to many and yes to one. When a candidate with no evident applicable skill or visible propensity for a particular job applies, are the applicants un-smart? Are they stubborn? Are they non-savvy? Are they delusional? Are they a pain?
Some or all of the above are correct. And these are
not attributes a hiring manager looks for in a new employee.
Unqualified candidates…,
hello out there… You are
not owed an interview if you are without qualifications for a position. I wonder if you are
even owed an email back saying you are not getting an interview. If you are unqualified and cannot prove a reason for consideration, how could you possibly prove a reason for hire? When unemployment is high, there
is going to be an inordinate amount of applicants streaming in. Not every position warrants nor should it require direct recruitment (headhunting). Recruiters or Hiring Managers who use job boards or social channels should not be subjected to a bad recruiter experience because they spread the news via the internet or (gulp!) classified ads in a newspaper.
I have always taken care of candidates who have been interviewed, calling them back to tell them no is one of the hardest parts of my job, but I do it.
Why? Because I should, it is the decent thing to do. Quick question, how long do you have to
pay it forward? That’s what I thought…
Rayanne Thorn, @ray_anne is the Marketing Director for the online recruiting software company, Broadbean Technology. She is also a proud mother of four residing in Laguna Beach, California, and a contributor for Blogging4Jobs. Connect with her on LinkedIn.
